Archive for March, 2008

Pretty. Odd. : a review

March 31, 2008

Pretty. Odd. is the sophomore album by Panic at the Disco (formerly Panic! at the Disco). I know what you are thinking: “Aren’t they the guys who dressed up like circus clowns and 1920s strip club patrons in their videos with long titles and absurd lyrics?”

Yes. Yes, they are.

I’m not embarrassed to say I enjoyed their over-the-top theatrics. But this album is both a parody, an impression and an homage to the Beatles.

Its an attempt to try be Sargent Peppers with all of the ridiculousness of the Beatles weirder hits like “Yellow Submarine “and “I Am the Walrus.”

Some have lambasted Panic for this album as way too much of a departure from their emo-antics, and others say they are shamelessly ripping off the Beatles. I happen to enjoy singer Brandon Urie’s voice a lot in this album. He sounds older, but retains hints of his youthful whine, while the notes he belts out linger in your head. I like the variety in the album, the harmonicas, brass sections, military drum corps, western-Johnny Cash sounds, and choppy British distorted guitars.

One of the best qualities of Pretty. Odd. is shocking for an (former?) emo band. IT’S BRIGHT AND HAPPY!

Imagine that! A record full of songs about happy relationships with women, positive friendship, hope and more. Its youthful in its naivety, but its also a great break from most of the brooding music out today.

Check it out. You might be pleasantly surprised.

Rating: 3/4

Here’s a link to the album’s first music video: Nine in the Afternoon

changed the title of my blog

March 30, 2008

yup. i did.

i’ve used up so much more than 9 lives, failing a class

March 30, 2008

this post will return in a week or so….

Poll: Medical neglect and faith

March 27, 2008

In response to the Fox News story about parents who prayed for 30 days rather than take her to the doctor (found here: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,342249,00.html), I decided to put up a poll to see readers thoughts on the matter.

After reading the story, take the poll below.

Poll

Perpetually Waiting for the Other Shoe to Drop

March 27, 2008

Right now, I am studying for a statistics exam at 7:30. I need a C or better in this class to keep my spot at WesternU CVM. Sounds easy, right? Yes, it is.*

*Disclaimer: Somehow, despite everyone else getting As in the class (the median grade on the first exam was 91 and average homework scores are in the 90s as well), I am not doing so hot. I got a 74 on the first exam. I studied for two days and felt I knew all the material on the test. I walked out thinking I got a 90+, easily.

Not so much.

Apparently, I constantly forget things like rounding and make simple mistakes like not square-rooting a variance. I could have plenty of time left over to check things out, and spend each minute scrupulously examining my work. And still tons of mistakes slip through. I just don’t get it.

Anywho, this relates to the title because I am always fearing that I won’t succeed, even when I do. Applying to Cornell in 2004 I was convinced I’d get rejected. Somehow, I got in. Hell, the valedictorian got wait-listed and I was many ranks behind him.

I always start out semesters thinking I will get straight As and I work hard. Then something happens and I fall apart where I can’t perform well. I start thinking I’ll get Fs and flunk out. But someone every semester its been okay and I usually get in the B-range.

Now, applying to vet school I was convinced I’d never get in. I applied to only 5 schools (read: terrible idea), but still got interviews at half and an acceptance in California.

So you can see that it isn’t just paranoia or lack of self-confidence, my stats example alone should indicate that I sometimes have problems. I wonder though, to what degree do I let classes and life situations get to “critical mass” before I get serious and try to fix them.

I usually extrapolate bumps-in-the-road those to the negative extreme. I suppose it’s better than the alternative of boundless, unfounded optimism.

But the downside is an elevated blood pressure as I wait for the other shoe to drop.

Election 2008 Pokemon

March 26, 2008

Because I relish any dig against Sean Hannity…

March 25, 2008

from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/23/sean-hannity-confronted-o_n_92961.html

Sean Hannity Confronted Over His Relationship With Neo-Nazi Hal Turner

by

Jason Linkins

The folks over at NewsHounds have been watching their Fox News Channel quarry dither over Senator Barack Obama’s associations with pastor Jeremiah Wright, and noted Fox’s own Sean Hannity getting himself tripped up in the guilt-by-association tango. Seems that one of Hannity’s former close chums is a neo-Nazi named Hal Turner who used to be a radio host, is apparently the top man in Bergen, NJ white-supremacist circles, and probably spends a lot of his time in his basement with Star Wars action figures acting out Holocaust-denier versions of The Return of the Jedi. In short, just the sort of person with whom you’d imagine Sean Hannity spends a lot of formational time with.

Anyway, a few days ago, Hannity brought Malik Shabazz of the New Black Panther Party on the show. Shabazz and his organization had previously chosen to endorse Barack Obama, who subsequently rejected the endorsement. It was up to Hannity to make some hay out of this, but the tables got turned very quickly. From NewsHounds:

Hannity added, “What I don’t think you’re understanding here, Malik, is that when you hear the minister of him for 20 years, when you hear the associations with Louis Farrakhan, one of the biggest racists and anti-Semites in the country, what you’re not understanding is, America hears extremism at its worst.”
Shabazz responded, “Let me ask you this. Are you to be judged by your promotion and association with Hal Turner?”

Hannity waved his arm around. “I don’t know anybody named – this is nonsense. I don’t…” Then Hannity changed his tune. “Sir, sir… That was a man that was banned from my radio show ten years ago, that ran a Senate campaign in New Jersey.”

Then, as Shabazz refused to stop talking or back down, Hannity, in a tacit admission, said, “I’m not running for president.”

“A neo Nazi, you backed his career,” Shabazz said.

Hannity answered, “That is an absolute, positive, lie and you’ve been reading the wrong websites…, my friend. Good try.”

Well, there’s plenty of evidence to the contrary (Max Blumenthal’s piece in Nation is good for a start), but it hardly matters, because don’t you know, days later, Turner himself was doing his pal a total solid by coming out and stating, “Oh, yeah! We’re best of buds!”

I was quite disappointed when Sean Hannity at first tried to say he didn’t know me and then went on to say that I ran some senate campaign in New Jersey. In fact, Sean Hannity does know me and we were quite friendly a number of years ago.
When Hannity took over Bob Grant’s spot on 77 WABC in New York City, I was a well-known, regular and welcome caller to his show. Through those calls, Sean and I got to know each other a bit and at some point, I can’t remember exactly when, Sean gave me the secret “Guest call-in number” at WABC so that my calls could always get on the air.

I mean, Hannity gave Turner his Super Secret Little Anti-Semite Annie Decoder Ring so he could call him up whenever he wanted to! If the two men had been younger – and mentally eligible for a high school education – they surely would have gone to prom together!

Anyway, Turner and Hannity have a nice, long, intimate, chummy history, and Turner offers the essential blow-by-blow. “I can tell you from my firsthand, personal experience that Sean Hannity does, in fact, agree with many of my political and social views. I can also tell you that Sean Hannity disagrees with some of my political and social views. I won’t go subject-by-subject to say which he agrees with and which he disagrees with. You can figure that out easy enough on your own!” Can we? What if we’re not enthusiastic fans of the thought processes of nimrods, though?

Naturally, Turner has got a blustery warning for us all: “Another big difference is that I am perfectly willing to use force and violence against my enemies while Sean Hannity and others are not. Those using me as a prop to attack Sean Hannity would do well to remember this fact. Rest assured I will remember them when the opportunity presents itself; especially as it pertains to that douche bag sodomite Max Blumenthal for the falsehoods and total trash he wrote about me in ‘The Nation’ magazine.”

Update: Newhounds has updated its Hannity/Turner post, pointing out a comment signed by Phil Boyce, Program Director of WABC, Hannity’s radio station, disputing many of the facts, especially the dates, in Turner’s account (Boyce’s comment has been posted here as well. See first comment below). Newshounds responded to Boyce’s criticisms, saying: “the real issue is what was Turner allowed to say on the air, how often and what was Hannity’s reaction? We have an article in a national magazine plus one of the parties involved who say that Hannity was a welcoming, friendly and encouraging host for Turner’s views for a good while. Neither Boyce nor Hannity has specifically denied that.”

Does anyone else do this?

March 25, 2008

I realized lately that I try to read way too many books at once and inevitably end up abandoning half of them.

Right now I’m “reading” the following books (though I haven’t touched several in months):

A Clockwork Orange

Gravity’s Rainbow

Naked

Our Word is Our Weapon

V

The Road

Player Piano

Like that list is gonna get chopped down any time soon…..heh, maybe

Radical (any) Religion is The Greatest Threat

March 20, 2008

You hear it again and again on the campaign trail: “The Greatest Threat to America today is that of Radical Islam”

John McCain is convinced, the first of his three main issues on his campaign website is “Winning the war against Islamic extremists.” (link: http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Issues/)

From Fox News to CNN, everyone is in a tizzy about militant Islam.

My question is this: Shouldn’t we be concerned about the broader threat of Radical Religion?

From fringe nutcases like Fred Phelps of the Westboro Baptist Church and the KKK for Christianity, to Zionist nationalist groups exacerbating violence between Israel and Palestine, to true Islamic terror to violent cults, religion has the potential to cause large scale death.

To be certain, religion inspires and gives hope the billions of people across the globe, from Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, and others. Life is filled with nagging questions about who we are, why we are here, and how we shall live. Science cannot answer these questions, but faith and spirituality can.

Religious charity and compassion gives food to the needy across the globe, it clothes the poor, and fights for social justice. Groups like Compassion International and The Christian Children’s Fund fight to prevent people in the Third World from succumbing to poverty.

All three Judeo-Christian faiths work to fight AIDS in Africa, homeless in the US, human trafficking in Asia, and drug addiction world-wide.

To push aside religion influencing politics would be to discount the Protestant Evangelical movement that was active in the abolition of slavery and women’s suffrage. It would ignore the non-violent Buddhist monks that led protests against Vietnam and oppression in South East Asia. It would ignore that many scientists around the globe say “I do not think my belief in God means science is any less valid,” and work to explain the natural phenomena all around us.

But continuing on with my original thesis, let’s just name a few historical episodes where religion has been a primary factor in genocide.

-Romans persecuting Christians: pagan Romans slaughtering Christians on a huge scale

-The Crusades: centuries of massacre between a Christian/Islamic clash

-Spanish Inquisition: Spanish catholics enforcing orthodoxy and slaying heretics

-Protestant Witch Trials in America: Murders based on superstition

-Sand Creek Massacre: Manifest Destiny, God told settlers to travel to the west coast, claiming land and baptizing heathens as they went, murdering the Indian on the other side of rivers

-Holocaust: The largest group experiencing genocide were Jews, and gained support through anti-Semitism and scape goating

-KKK: Christian white nationalist movement that killed and terrorized blacks, and non-Christians

-Israelite fighting in Palestine: Two religious groups say God told them they own the land, long-term war ensues

-Current Jihad: Islamic extremists punish infidels with vengeance and death

Now this list is neither exhaustive, nor historically fleshed out. For the sake of brevity, large cultural, economic, and political factors are omitted. For example, when describing the Holocaust, I did not mention the economic ruin of Germany following the Treary of Versailles, or the rise of a military nationalist party, and the persecution of non-Jewish groups.

The larger point is that religion can be implicated in some of history’s worst violent genocides. When people claim divine revelation gave them an imperative to subjugate others, or a mandate of superiority, bad things tend to happen.

Why are we singling out Islam as “the greatest threat to our country”? It is certainly a threat, but some of the most vehement anti-Islam advocates spew horrific religious hate themselves!

Take John McCain’s spiritual adviser Ron Parseley who has called for the West to “eradicate the false religion” of Islam. (link: http://www.motherjones.com/washington_dispatch/2008/03/john-mccain-rod-parsley-spiritual-guide.html) Note that he is NOT saying we need to combat terrorism, but actually destroy the Islamic faith and people! If someone used the KKK as a justification for a global campaign to eradicate Christians he would probably be thrown in jail, fired, and never able to work again. But it is somehow okay for Pastor Ron to disparage an entire FAITH that gives hope and inspiration to millions of people.

Another person supporting “death to Islamofascists” is Rev. John Hagee, who recently endorsed John McCain. This man held a “slave sale” fundraiser at his Church, claiming “This Sunday, slavery is returning to Cornerstone church!” (link: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06208/709076-84.stm), said Hurricane Katrina was a “judgement of God’s Wrath” on the city for hosting a gay pride parade and called the Catholic Church “the great whore” (link: http://mediamatters.org/items/200802280018)

Now it is a tad unfair to highlight only McCain supports, but Obama has also been endorsed by the religious nuts Jeremiah Wright and Luis Farrakhan. I don’t try to hide the fact that I lean left, but I do believe in full disclosure.

The statements from those two men should horrify you. Now you might shrug it off saying “They’re just words, they haven’t actually killed anyone.” To that I counter that it takes a charismatic person with fiery rhetoric to incite violence. Hitler’s continuing scapegoating of Jews in the ’30s was at first merely racist bigotry, but slowing convinced followers and then the nation to act on those.

You might also say “These men are fringe lunatics, they don’t have influence.” First, many of these beliefs are shared by “mainstream” evangelicals, like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson. Robertson has said many horrible things in his life, including “don’t be surprised” if a great tragedy befell Dover, PA during the evolution/ID trial, called Episcopalians/Presbyterians/Methodists “the spirit of the Antichrist,” and calling professors in academia “racists, murderers, sexual deviants and supporters of Al-Qaeda” (link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Robertson_controversies) He has written many best-selling books, been consulted by politicians for decades, and has a highly rated television program called The 700 Club.

To quote a pre-sellout John McCain, I will call all of the statements above and those who made them “agents of intolerance.” Terrorism from the Middle-East is certainly one of many threats facing America. But continuing to turn a blind eye to religion used as a justification for hate is one of humanity’s longest standing threats to peace. When you look at the vitriolic intolerance that can be spewed from religious fundamentalists, the war some launch on science, their influence on world affairs and wars, you really have to see that fundamentalism is something to be rejected.

It’s a big world. Some people subscribe to the same faith you do. That’s great. Others don’t believe like you. That’s fine. And some people don’t have any beliefs at all. And that’s okay, too.

Western University Acceptance

March 18, 2008

Today I was accepted into the Doctor of Veterinary Medicine program at Western University in Pomona, CA.

I will spend the next few days thinking about whether to accept this or hold out for Iowa State but to be honest, it seems like a pretty easy decision.

More likely than not, I will be spending the next four years outside of LA studying animal medicine.

Here’s to the next four years of medical school!